Showing posts with label PC Upgrade. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PC Upgrade. Show all posts

Friday, July 2, 2010

. . . Modular PC Upgrading -- Introduction

Modular PC Upgrade Series Part 1
(from the Cape Cod Times Digital Grind Column)

A Brief Foreword on this Series

This post is part of a multi-part series on the subject of Modular PC Ownership.

The system of Modular PC Ownership espoused in this series follows a green conservation approach to technology that is intended to reduce your individual carbon footprint, save you money, improve your computing satisfaction, and increase the value in many respects that you receive from your personal computer. Each posting on this blog has been created to support and enhance a related column published in the newspaper.

Today's posting begins the blog-based complimentary support for the series that will appear in the Cape Cod Times Digital Grind Column.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Table of Contents

Part 1: Speaking of MPCU -- Introduction
01: Preface
02: Introduction
03: The Economics of Modular Upgrading
04: Introduction Conclusion

Part 2: Speaking of MPCU - Keyboards
05: Introduction
06: Connectivity Options
07: Keyboards Conclusion

Part 3: Speaking of MPCU - Controllers & Sound
08: Introduction
09: Controllers
10: PC Sound
11: Controllers & Sound Conclusions

Part 4: Speaking of MPCU - Computer Cases
12: Introduction
13: What a Case Should Do
14: How to Begin Building your Foundation

Part 5: Speaking of MPCU - Power Supply Units (PSU's)
15: Introduction
16: Selecting a Power Supply
17: Quality vs. Cost

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Introduction

01. Preface

This article is intended to compliment the PC Upgrade Series that is running now in rotation on my column, Digital Grind, in the Cape Cod Times. You have been provided this link in addition to the information in my reply to your email in order to supplement the information published in the paper. As always, if you have questions -- or there is information that you need that has not been addressed either in the column or these complimentary postings -- please feel invited to email me. Send your email to chris@boots-faubert.com with the topic indicating that your mail is about the Upgrade Series.


02. Introduction

Part I of the Modular PC Upgrade Series appeared in the 13 April 2010 edition of the Cape Cod Times, in the Business and Technology Section, as a regular part of the Digital Grind Column. With the publication of the first piece in the series, I will be rotating each new piece with the regular columns to add some variety to the column, which will allow the series to run through the Summer and into the Fall, when most people start to think about upgrading or replacing their PC, so regular readers should be very well equipped to tackle that issue when the time comes!

This series is a multi-part examination of the practice of adopting a "modular approach" to upgrading your personal computer. What does that mean? Sit back and relax and I will try to explain that in simple and easy to understand terms, because as complex as the personal computer can be, this part of the equation is actually pretty simple!

The upgrade path for most PC owners usually consists of replacement of a peripheral -- a new monitor, the addition of an external storage device, or adding RAM or a hard drive internally. Generally speaking, upgrades of this sort are made when the PC user is seeking to lengthen the usable lifespan of their computer, and are often the last step in the life of a personal computer before it is replaced.

With the troubled economy today, a much larger percentage of PC owners are choosing to "make do" with what they have, or look for ways to lengthen the useful lifespan of their computer by adding capacity, or new components. Generally this is a temporary approach, as they have the intention of replacing the computer eventually, with a new computer.

Roughly 70% of PC owners (7 out of every 10) choose this approach, and when the speed or performance level of their present PC finally reaches the point at which they are no longer willing to tolerate its performance, end up fully replacing it. The average cost for a new general use computer, when it is not bought on sale, runs between $700 and $2000 depending upon the various options they choose. For a dedicated Gaming PC that top end can easily surpass $3,000.

Conversely, 3 out of every 10 owners take a different approach to their PC -- what is called the "Modular Upgrade Path." Rather than completely replace their computer every year or two, they simply upgrade the parts that are causing them problems, either installing -- or paying an expert to install -- these components, and in so doing not only increase the effective use and lifespan of their computer, but save a lot of money in the process.

A modular approach to PC ownership has many benefits, including:
  • Better control of the quality of the components;
  • Doubling the average lifespan for a PC; and
  • Saving as much as 60% of the cost of a new PC
I want to underscore that last bullet-point: adopting a modular approach to PC ownership can save you as much as 60% of the cost of a new PC without sacrificing anything! In fact, by hand-selecting the components that go into your PC, you not only save money, but end up with a better PC in the process!


03. The Economics of Modular Upgrading

A new name-brand PC is built by the manufacturer in a fixed and standard pattern. Once the type of CPU and motherboard are chosen, the maker then either purchases a mass-produced case or, more often, has their in-house engineers design the case for the new model, often for the purposes of making it distinct in its appearance, and to appeal to the potential customer. Case design is actually something of a science in the PC industry -- a subject that we will examine in-depth later in this series -- but for now, the important thing to understand is that what goes inside that new model of PC may not get there, or be, what you think it is.

Once the external appearance of the computer is finalized, the name-brand computer company uses an open-bid process to find the manufacturers for the components that will go inside the computer. As a general rule they work with a set list of companies, or a consortium, so who ends up being chosen and how they end up being chosen may not completely conform to the whole open-bid process, but either way, the lowest bidder ends up making the parts.

That usually surprises most PC owners, because there is an assumption that since the brand name is stamped on the outside, what is inside is also made by that company, but this is rarely the case. In reality the company whose name is on the outside of the case only assembles the PC, they don't manufacture it.

Almost every component inside the case, from the motherboard to the power supply, are purchased based on the lowest bid, which means whatever component manufacturer bid the lowest is who ends up winning the contract. In the real world that is not always a good thing, but in the computer world, it is the normal approach to controlling the costs -- and therefore the profits -- associated with a new PC.

To make this easier to understand, let's use a hypothetical example... Let's say that you want to purchase a new computer, and you like the computers made by the Really Big Computer Company (RBC) because they have been around a long time, they have a reputation for making good computers, and you have even owned one of their computers in the past, and liked it. You use them at work, and think highly of them because they have really great advertising campaigns that use famous actors, and besides, they are a standard in the PC industry!

The model you are thinking about buying is their Supergreat PC XL, and it comes with 2GB of RAM, a 3.0GHz dual-core CPU made by Intel, and has a 1TB hard drive in it. It comes with a DVD/RW optical drive, a keyboard, mouse, and set of speakers. It has USB 2.0 ports on it, and an external eSATA port in the back. The slimline case is very nifty looking, and it seems to have plenty of available slots for expanding it later if you want to add something like a BluRay drive or an extra video card. It has built-in video, built-in sound, and a built-in Ethernet port, so it fully meets all of your needs.

The cost of the Supergreat PC XL is just $999.00 after the rebate, if you buy it from the RBC website. If you buy it in a bricks-and-mortar store, you would end up paying $1,299 for it, but then you would have a local warranty and you could get it the same day. Either way you choose to buy it, the system comes with a 90 day complete warranty, and some of the parts are covered for longer -- and besides, RBC is a reliable company, so why worry about that?

There are different options you could choose, but you go with the standard ones, because a larger hard drive or a BluRay player would significantly increase the cost of the system. It comes with Windows 7, but for an extra $50 you can downgrade that to Windows XP if you like -- but you go with Windows 7 because it is newer and, really, makes more sense. The computer is plenty fast enough to run it, and it has 2GB of RAM, which should be plenty, right?

After shipping and taxes, your order off of the RBC website totals just over $1,100 which is almost $200 less than you would have spent if you bought it at a local store, so hey, you saved some bucks! That is always something to be happy about!

Your younger brother Tim wants a new computer, and you tell him all about your new one and perhaps show it to him, demonstrating all of the cool things that it can do. It is fast, it is cool looking, and you like it! Tim likes it too, but he is a bit more tech-savvy when it comes to computers than you are, and he decides that rather than buy one like yours, he will build it himself.

You might scoff at the notion. You have heard that it can cost a lot to do that, and besides you will never end up with the same computer in the end, you explain to Tim. Yours was made by RBC - they practically invented the computer!

  • Tim's Computer

As he sets out to build his new PC, Tim sets a budget of $1,100 or about what you spent. He wants to get a comparable computer to what you have, because he likes the speed and abilities he saw, but since he is into gaming, he wants a bit more expansion capacity and needs a higher level of system cooling than you do.

After carefully evaluating the market, Tim decides to buy the following:
  • Coolermaster CM 690 Case (Newegg.com $69.99)
  • Coolermaster Silent Pro M 600Watt Power Supply (case-mod.com $86.99)
  • Thermaltake Frio CPU Cooling System (Thermaltake $59.99)
  • Intel Core i5-650 3.2 GHz Dual-Core CPU (Newegg $179.99)
  • ASRock P55 Motherboard (Newegg $134.99)
  • 4GB Kingston DDR3 Memory Kit (Newegg $111.99)
  • 2TB SATA 3.0GB Hitachi Hard Drive (Newegg $129.99)
  • Plextor 24x CDRW/DVDRW w/Lightscribe (Newegg $39.99)
  • GEForce 9800 GT 1GB Video Card (Newegg $109.99)
  • Logitech 920 illuminated keyboard (Newegg $59.99)
  • Logitech MX18 Gaming Mouse (Newegg $42.99)
  • Creative Inspire T3130 Speaker System (Newegg $49.99)
Total cost $1,039 after shipping $1,094.95

Like you, your brother Tim used his old monitor. Unlike you the system that Tim ended up with is slightly better than yours -- the main differences are:
  • Twice as much memory
  • Twice as much hard drive storage capacity
  • 4x the video RAM
  • A slightly faster CPU
  • Better keyboard
  • Better mouse
  • Better speakers
The one drawback is that Tim had to purchase a copy of Windows 7 because it did not come with his computer, and his old system runs Vista.

  • Quality is never an Accident

Above you note the obvious differences in the two systems. You might be thinking that since Tim spent nearly as much as you did, even if he got twice as much RAM and Hard Drive, and a slightly faster CPU as well as better video card, he still had to buy the OS so you came out ahead, right? Well, no. Not so much...

A few months down the road, both of your systems got nailed by the same virus and you both are forced to re-install the OS and apps! Tim has his set of installation discs because he bought his copy of Windows 7. You don't -- your PC came with the OS installed but no discs -- in order to get a set of discs you have to pay an extra $99.99 to RBC. You go ahead and pay that in order to get a set of discs, but you have to wait while they send them to you, whereas Tim was able to get his system back up in less than a day...

A few weeks later a new game, World of Warfighting Monkey Goats, was released, and it is a game that both you and Tim really like. According to the specifications, both of your systems are capable of running it, and in fact Tim installs the game on his PC and is playing, while you are having a small problem.

It seems that World of Warfighting Monkey Goats has a minimum requirement of 512MB of dedicated video RAM. Tim's system has 1GB so he is all set, but your system has a built-in video card that actually borrows its memory from the system RAM. It was set at 256MB but you go ahead and increase it to 512MB so that the game will run, but when you try to run the game, it will not run now for a different reason!

After carefully reading the error message, you realize that the minimum system RAM requirements for the game is 2GB -- well that is okay! You have 2GB! Ah, but you don't, because you "borrowed" 512MB of the system RAM for the video card, which means you only actually have 1.5GB of RAM available. The OS used almost 1 full GB itself, so that half a gig that is left over is simply not adequate for the game to run...

You have to make a choice -- upgrade the memory, or add a new video card with its own RAM. That means spending more money on your PC!

You decide to add RAM to the system, so you go to Best Buy and purchase 2 GB of DDR3 RAM. You call Tim to come over and add the RAM to your system for you, but when he opens the case up, you discover that all of the RAM slots are already filled! Instead of using 2 1GB memory sticks in your computer, the manufacturer used 4 512MB sticks, filling up all 4 memory slots, because those cost the manufacturer less than the 1GB sticks would have.

Okay, you shrug. Pull two of the 512MB sticks and put in the two 1GB sticks -- that should give you 3GB of RAM, more than enough to run the game! Tim does as you ask, but when you turn your computer on, you get an error and it will not boot. It turns you that you cannot mix memory sizes! All the chips have to be the same size!

Frustrated, you go back to the store and purchase two more 1GB memory sticks, return home, and Tim installs them for you. You boot the system and it runs fine - no errors! Excellent! Of course you now have 2GB of memory in your hand that you paid for when you bought the PC, and that you cannot use anymore. You throw them into your desk drawer and decide to just forget about them.

You can now load the game, and you do, but when you run it, it is painfully slow and frustrating to play because of that. You cannot figure it out! Why does the game run and look great on Tim's PC but looks horrible and runs slow on YOURS?!

After a few days of frustrating web surfing, you discover that the reason that it runs so poorly on your system is because of the built-in video card in your PC. The version of the card is similar to the one Tim bought, but it is an older chipset, and does not have as robust a GPU or processor. In addition to that, the lack of dedicated RAM is also slowing the video down because it has to access the system RAM instead of using its own dedicated RAM.

You have already spent almost $250.00 on RAM, now you need to buy a video card!

Based on Tim's happiness with the card he has, you buy one of those from Newegg for 109.99 and he installs it in your PC. You run the game and it is as good as Tim's PC! Excellent! You are very happy. But then you think about something...

You originally paid $1,100 for your PC, but after the upgrades that you had to pay for, the adjusted cost for the system is now $1,459.99! That is more than Tim paid for his system even with the cost of the OS! And Tim did not have to pay an extra $99 to get the OS discs -- oh! You forgot to add that to the cost! That makes your system cost $1,558.99! Wow, that turned out to be an expensive computer!

Now fast-forward two years, and two generations of CPU. Both your PC's are now a little too slow to run the current games and software, so it is time upgrade. Tim ends up spending $300 on a new motherboard and CPU he bought as a package deal, with 4GB of RAM, and you both replaced your video cards the year before so you don't factor that cost.

But when you go to check out the package deal that Tim bought, you discover that your computer uses a special motherboard that is not the standard size, and worse, a standard sized motherboard will not fit in your case! Even if it would fit, the plugs for the power supply in your case are not the standard type, so you would need a new power supply.

You start to think that maybe you should just buy a whole new computer -- that would have to be cheaper... Right?

This is why a modular approach to PC ownership can be beneficial. This doesn't matter as much if all that you use your PC for is surfing the web and word processing, but when you start using games or programs that are resource dependent it becomes a real issue.


04. Introduction Conclusion

In the example above I highlight the most common issues associated with the two approaches. In the long run, Tim ends up saving money, not because he spent less, but because he got more for the money he spent. When it comes time to replace the components you are left with no choice but to buy a new system, or build one, where Tim already has the infrastructure in place to simply upgrade the components that need to be upgraded, without having to spend money to replace the bits that do not.

When you choose the modular approach over the packaged approach, it is often smarter to spend a little more on the various parts in order to obtain better options and features. For instance a standard mid-tower case can be had, off the shelf, for as little as $49.99 at any large computer store. That case will have a power supply, and it will accept the standard hardware. It will serve your basic computing needs, but it is constructed of sheet metal and plastic, and has an inexpensive power supply in it that usually maxes out at around 450 watts.

If you were instead to purchase a better case, from a company like Thermaltake or Coolermaster, you end up spending more money, but you get more for that money. The cheap case comes with one cooling fan, whereas the better cases from those two makers come with three to five fans, and have slots available to add additional fans if you need to.

These cases do not come with power supplies -- you purchase those separately. Instead of a cheap 450w PSU, you pay a bit more and you get a much higher quality 700w PSU that has an actual warranty and is expected to last 5 or more years without needing to be replaced. The same is not true about the cheaper PSU's that come with the standard cases. Those have no warranty associated with them, and are not expected to last much longer than the 2 year average lifespan of a computer.

By spending a little more, you end up saving money, because when it comes time to replace your motherboard and CPU, you only have to replace those and not the case and PSU! The same basic logic and economics apply to the other components in your computer, and selecting the components yourself allows you to control the quality and performance level of each.

As this series continues, we are going to examine the different components that go into the modern PC, and explore options and choices, in order to build a high-quality PC. While we are going to follow a budget, and in the end we may spend almost as much as it would cost to purchase a packaged PC from a name brand manufacturer, like Tim in the story above, we will end up getting a lot more value for each dollar that we spend than we would buying a package deal.

As each part in the series comes out I will be adding a post here to discuss the various options in some detail, so check back here regularly to follow along with the series. If you are contemplating building a new PC, or upgrading your existing one, I hope that you will consider a modular approach, because economically it makes a lot more sense.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

CM Boots-Faubert is a freelance writer, author, and columnist. He writes the Digital Grind Column for the Cape Cod Times, and the Game On: Cape Cod Gaming Blog at the paper. He writes extensively on video games and gaming, both as a freelance journalist and as a walkthrough writer, reviewer, and previewer. His books include the soon to be published title Games Journalism 101, that discusses how to establish a career writing on video games, and his title in the Hand's On Series, Hand's On: Home Networking which is a complete guide targeted at the average PC user on how to design and build a home computer Ethernet network.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

. . . PC Upgrade Philosophy

I am in the process of writing a new series for the Digital Grind Column over at the Cape Cod Times on upgrading your computer -- which may seem like an obvious and predictable subject on the face of it, but it is turning out to be anything but that.

Part of the process of writing any piece is researching it to get a full and complete picture of the subject -- which as I note above in this case is upgrading your computer.

Statistically there are two groups of computer owners -- the first (and largest) is what I call the "Replacers" and the second smaller group are the "Upgraders." Both groups have distinct sub-groups within them, and I want to digress for a moment and examine those...

Replacers Group
This is the largest of the main groups, and some estimates put their number around 75% of all computer owners. The statistics I accessed represent a view of consumers rather than business and corporate owners, basically the average Joe or Jane with a computer in other words.

According to what I have learned, these people purchased their computer as a unit -- most often from a brick-and-mortar store rather than online (online purchasing of new computers is still a fairly small percentage of the consumer group excluding purchases from the websites of the PC makers, which for the purposes of the statistics I used count the same as if they bought their computer at Staples or Best Buy).

Their notion of a computer is a ready-to-use unit that comes in boxes and, save for the display, comes from a single source. When it is time to replace their computer -- whether it breaks or is too old/slow or for whatever reason -- they will repeat their choice by purchasing the new computer as a single unit. This is a comfort level choice for many, but a significant chunk of this sort of consumer believes this to be the "normal" way you buy or replace a computer.

One of the consequences of the rough economy is that this group is not following its established trends -- for example it was not uncommon for the consumers in this group to regularly replace their PC's. The average life span for their PC's was 16 months, with a significant percentage replacing their PC's annually. When the economy started to sour in 200/2001 this group delayed replacing their PC's until they felt it was absolutely necessary, which added around 3 months to the cycle. That represented something of a hiccup, but not one with an impact severe enough to dent the market.

The last major downturn in the economy a few years ago changed their pattern significantly however, and that three-month delay turned into an indefinite one for a very large percentage of these folks. The result of that was not a hiccup but a disaster, and it is largely what the statistics people are referring to when they speak of depression of the PC market.

Rather than a short delay before replacing, these folks have been holding on to and making do with what they have until they are forced to replace their PC. Performance does not seem to be the deciding factor - with the most obvious trend being that they resist replacing their PC until it breaks. That change in this groups purchasing habits had a decided impact on the industry - not a good one I should not have to add.

At least part of the concern is how this group views the PC -- as a unit rather than a device with components. An obvious side-effect of that POV is that they do not embrace the notion of upgrading their PC, as replacing is the logical -- some research suggests "the only" -- choice available to them.

Upgraders Group

The second group is the Upgraders -- among which there are a number of sub-groups, from the smallest which is the PC owners who do their own upgrading, to the largest, being those who will pay a shop or tech-savvy friend to do the upgrading for them.

When the computer component makers push products out to get them reviewed and advertise both online and in magazines, these are their primary target audience, and considering how small this group is compared to the first group, you would think that these companies would spend twice as much money trying to reach the first group as they do this one in the hopes of converting some of them. Well, if you thought that (I did) you might be surprised to learn that no, not so much really.

A Modular Approach to the PC

The primary focus of the series of columns I am writing is directed towards promoting a more modular approach to the subject. The idea is simple enough really -- while upgrading components does not give you a new PC, it can make your old one feel like it is new, or at least stretch its useful lifespan considerably.

Statistically -- if you follow those trends -- a PC owner who upgrades (whether they pay some one else to do the upgrade or do it themselves) gets more out of their PC for longer. Folks from the first group get an average of 14 to 20 months worth of use out of a PC before replacing it. Folks in the second group (Upgraders in other words) average between 26 and 40 months out of their PC before completely replacing it. That is a significant difference!

In fact the difference is even more significant when you consider that the second group tends to skip generations in PC technology. What I mean by that is that the Replacers tend to own a system from each generation, whereas the Upgraders tend to own a system from every other generation -- and in the end, even though the Upgraders seem to be spending more money because they are making regular upgrade purchases every 6 to 8 months, in the end they actually end up spending less when you look at the over-all annual cost of computer ownership!

The Upgrade Series

The idea for this series is to convince as many people as I can that a modular approach is a better way to do it. The logic of this is really very simple... Here is an example, using my own computer and my experience.

Almost 4 years ago I bought a new computer -- my old computer had died and while I could have built my own component-by-component because I was short on time and because I needed that PC right away (a lot of my work happens on it) instead I chose to purchase a bare-bones system from a company that makes its money by building those exclusively.

By eschewing the brand name PC makers, I was able to obtain a basic and reasonably fast modern computer for about a third the cost of one from HP, for example. The system I bought was basic indeed -- consisting of the following:

  • A generic mid-tower case
  • An Intel Dual-Core 3.0 GHz CPU
  • A bog-standard motherboard with onboard sound, video, and ethernet
  • 1GB of RAM
  • A 320GB SATA2 Hard Drive
  • A bog-standard EIDE CD/CDR/DVD/DVDR all-in-one drive
  • A cheap wired keyboard
  • A cheap wired mouse
  • A mouse pad with the bare bones company name on it.
  • An ethernet cable.
I got all of that, shipped out to me in a matter of days for just under $400. At the time that was a good price for what I got!

When the system arrived I set it up where my old system used to be, using my old systems flatscreen monitor, ethernet connection, mouse, and keyboard. Using my licensed copy of Windows XP Pro, I spent a day installing and patching the OS, installing all my apps, and restoring all my data from our Network Accessible Storage Device, and I was back up and running with minimal fuss.

For what it was, it was good. In that configuration I did not run into problems with speed or capability for nearly 8 months, but around 8 months into the new PC, some of the new software that I was using wanted more resources than I had available. It was not a question of the system itself -- the CPU was plenty fast enough, but it became obvious that I needed to do some upgrading.

As I was running a 32-bit version of Microsoft Windows, adding any more than another GB of RAM would have been a waste of money -- for the most part 2GB of RAM is all that the 32 bit version of Windows can practically use, but there were other considerations when it comes to RAM to bear in mind.

The First Upgrade: RAM

If you were to go to a reputable computer shop or technician and tell them that you wanted to upgrade your RAM, and they learned that you were running a 32 but version of Windows and currently had 1 GB of RAM, they will likely suggest that you add another Gig of RAM.

Doing this *can* double the amount of memory in your system -- but I emphasized with the word "can" because that is not always true! Sometimes going from 1GB to 2GB does not equal doubling your systems RAM, and here is why...

Folks knowledgeable in the care and feeding of the PC will tell you that for a Windows XP/2000 system, 1GB of RAM is the minimum you should shoot for, and 2GB is better. For Windows Vista and now, Windows 7, 2GB of system RAM is the minimum amount you should have, and 4GB would be better. The thing is, when I upgraded my system to 2GB, what I ended up with was around 1.5GB of system RAM, whereas prior to the upgrade of the RAM even though there was 1GB installed, what I really had was 768MB not 1GB. Why?

The on-board video card that is built into the motherboard I have has a small amount of RAM that is all its own -- 128MB -- but because a lot of software needs a minimum of 256MB of RAM for video, the board borrows some of the system RAM for the video card! In my case it was borrowing an additional 128MB, and one of the programs that I regularly use borrows a small amount of system RAM and turns it into an imaginary scratch disk.

So even though I had a physical 1GB of RAM, once the system was fully booted and I was logged into the OS, I really had access to only 70% of that RAM. When I upgraded to 2GB that setup carried forward -- though the software side of the video card, noticing that there was more RAM available, added a little to the amount of RAM it was borrowing from the system.

Still that upgrade of an additional 1GB of system RAM did the trick, things went back to a usable state, and I was happy! About four months later I started running low on resources again -- it was time for some tweaking and another upgrade.

The Second Upgrade: A New Video Card

Adding RAM was an option - but if I had the 2GB of physical RAM that was in the system available to the OS that would solve me problem, I knew that. And adding more RAM beyond the 2GB that was in the system was not going to solve my new problem -- which had to do with slow video speed.

This new set of problems related to the fact that I needed to be able to shoot and edit video on my PC -- something I had never needed to do prior to this, but the nature of some of my writing had changed. Just writing using a word processing program and adding screen shots to illustrate the pieces was not enough, I was told. I needed to provide video illustrations with sound, I was told. But my system was not doing that very well!

The RAM that was borrowed from the system for the video card combined with a small amount of RAM that was borrowed by the mixing software for the sound side of the process was removing more RAM than the minimum spec's required by the mixing software -- and the end result was that I could not use that software at all to do what it was designed to do! I had to find a solution.

Faced with this situation, the average PC owner would have simply replaced the PC at this point, even though the CPU was more than adequate for what I needed. Adding RAM was not going to solve the problems I had -- sure it would have returned a small amount to the system as the program that I was using for mixing and editing WAS able to see RAM beyond the limit of the OS, but the video card would still be taking more than I could afford to lose from the RAM that the OS could see. The obvious solution was to replace the video card with one that had enough of its own RAM so that it would not need to borrow RAM from the system!

As I mentioned before, the "video card" is built into the motherboard, so turning it off was simply a matter of going into the PC Bios configuration menu prior to it fully booting into the OS. Knowing that, I spent a few days reviewing the currently available video card tech, and made a list of all of the cards that would work with the different software that I was using at the time.

Bear in mind that I was, at that time, still playing some MMO's that had very limiting requirements with respect to what video card chipsets that I could use. Add to that that I had to be able to use Direct-X 9 as a minimum (it was required by some of the games and one of the apps that I used) and that set out my path for me.

The onboard video was an Intel-based chipset. The way I saw it, I had to choose between ATI and Nvidia, as that was the core group that was dictated by the needs of the programs I was running. I knew that 256MB of video RAM was the *minimum* that I could have, and that much of the software I was running would happily take advantage of as much over that base amount as I could give it.

When it comes to upgrading your computer to increase speed, performance, capability, and reliability, upgrading your video card is right at the top of the list. The thing was, I needed to spend as little as I could get away with and still meet the requirements that were necessary for using the video editing software.

Luckily for me, just prior to the circumstances that prompted the need for another upgrade was when a new generation of video card chip technology was released, and as a result, most of the cards from the previous generation were now on sale at considerably slashed prices. I was in a good position!

After reviewing the market, I ended up selecting an Nvidia card that had a whopping 768MB of video RAM for what amounted to spare change compared to what a similarly-placed card would have cost from the new generation.

Having decided on the card that I wanted, I shopped around and found the best deal that I could on it online, paying $50 less than I would have spent buying it at Best Buy -- and when the card arrived I turned off the on-board video in the bios, installed the new card, and then booted up and downloaded the latest set of drivers and software for it from the makers website.

The difference was incredible and easy to see. It really did feel like I now had a new computer! I now had more system RAM, a much faster video display, way more video RAM, and a computer that felt like it was different -- like it was brand new.

One Upgrade Causes Another

Unfortunately there was an unforeseen problem waiting for me when I tried to make my first video... Remember that before I did not have enough system resources to make a video that was longer than 30 seconds. Now I could make videos as long as I wanted -- or at least as long as the available disc space would permit.

But when I made my first video under the new setup, I discovered that something was wrong with the audio side of the recording. There was a static-like background noise, and nothing that I could do with the configuration, or updating the drivers, or the software itself seemed to fix it!

It was a very frustrating situation.

After struggling with and trying different solutions -- and one of which might have worked -- I ended up researching the issue online, and quickly learned what the problem was. It turned out that the on-board sound card was not really a very high-quality setup. That alone meant nothing really, since I did not need to emulate the London Symphony, but I learned that the addition of the new video card was likely the source of the problem, because the sound card built into the motherboard was using a small section of memory that it should not really have been using, and THAT was what was causing the trouble!

Consider for a moment that previously it was not a problem -- but then I was using the on-board sound with the on-board video then, so of course there was no problem. The folks that made the motherboard had engineered it to work fluidly in that configuration, but here I had upset the apple cart, and was now using a configuration that they had not designed into the board when they built it.

Did they know that the sound card built into the board was using a small section of memory that it should not have been using? Yeah, probably. Did they have a fix I could apply? A patch? Some way to make the built-in sound card work with my screaming new video card? No. Uh-uh. They did not.

I had a choice to make -- and going back to using the built-in video was NOT on the table.

It was time for another upgrade!

The Third Upgrade: A New Sound Card

The choice was simple and painless. A quick look online and I was able to find a Sound Blaster Audigy card for $19 online that not only fixed the problem, but that expanded the sound capability of my PC!

When the card arrived in the mail, I shut off the ob-board sound card, installed the new one, downloaded and applied the newest drivers and software from Creative Labs, and was up and running flawlessly, with a minimum of tweaking to get the performance I needed.

The Fourth Upgrade: USB 2.0

As I began to use the PC for this new purpose, shooting and editing video to illustrate pieces I was writing for the web, I learned all sorts of new skills. Eventually though, I ended up needing to shoot longer videos, and needing to record play sessions in video games to use as source material for the video illustrations, which required me to get a capture device that I could use to connect my TV to the computer.

Despite the fact that my PC was, at this point, over 3 years old, I knew that its specifications included USB 2.0 and that was a good thing, because the capture device required USB 2.0 to function. The thing is, when I hooked it up, the first thing it did was tell me that it could not function, because I did not have it plugged into a USB 2.0 port.

"?!" thought I.

After carefully checking the motherboard spec's again, I knew that it was equipped with USB 2.0 ports. So why wasn't the capture card detecting that?!

I will save you a long description of all of the hassles and solutions that I attempted from drivers to software and everything in between and tell you what the actual problem was -- but I want to note that it took me a week to actually figure it out mostly because I had presumed something that I should not have presumed...

The problem was that even though the motherboard did indeed have USB 2.0 built into it, the case that the company that built my bare-bones PC had used was... Wait for it... Not wired for USB 2.o!

Seriously -- the wiring on the inside of the case was bog-standard USB 1.0 wiring, and while you can plug USB 1.0 wiring into the 2.0 slots on the motherboard, without that all-important extra wire that 2.0 uses, the motherboard can only deliver 1.0 spec if that wire is missing, and that was what was happening.

At this point I would forgive anyone for simply throwing their hands up and buying a new PC -- after all mine was well over 3 years old at this point, and there had been two new generations of CPU released by this point, so maybe replacing it was the way to go? Or maybe not. After all, this PC still had way more power than I was using or needed -- it was not an issue of it not being fast enough or able to run the programs that I needed to run -- it was a question of it not being ABLE to use the hardware that I needed to use.

So yes, I could have justified replacing the PC at that point -- but I did not want to. It is still a good system after all! Another option would have been to replace the case with one that has the modern wiring -- and I could have done that, but it would not have been a generic off-the-shelf $40 case, I have standards when it comes to cases (something I will be covering in the upgrade series).

Replacing the case would have meant spending anywhere from $100 to $175 not including the cost of the power supply -- and a quick check of the power supply in my existing case revealed that it was underpowered and of an odd construct, which meant it would not be a candidate for moving into a new case with the rest of the components.

I could have purchased some wire and tried to re-wire the case myself -- that was almost what I chose to do, but when I checked the price of wiring I discovered that it would cost around $35 to do it right. Why did I choose not to spend that $35 to re-wire the case? Simple, really -- a USB 2.0 add-on expansion card could be had online for less than $20 including shipping!

When the card came in the mail, I installed it, downloaded the drivers for it from the manufacturer, installed those, and I was back in business.

Upgrading the USB ports did not really have a noticeable impact on the system speed or anything, but I was now able to use the hardware that I needed to use, and everything was running smooth as silk! Problem solved! Mischief Managed!

But what is the point of all this?

Upgraded vs. Replaced

The point to this is simple enough, really. Despite having to upgrade this system four times in as many years, I still spent less money than I would have if I had replaced it at any point in this narrative -- and more significantly I still have a viable PC!

At this stage the system has some weaknesses, sure. There is software -- and games -- that I am reasonably sure it cannot run, but happily none of those are among the programs (and games) that I presently run or need to run. So in practical terms, this 4-year-old computer is still a fully functional and working system that meets my present needs.

I do plan on replacing it soon, as I plan to build a new system for myself, but my replacing this system will not end its usefulness at all! In fact, when I replace it in a few months that will be the trigger for a fifth upgrade!

I do not know what I will replace it with yet -- I have not walked down that path -- but when I replace it, I will be passing it on to one of my kids to use as their desktop PC. Before I do that, I will determine what the hottest fastest and most capable CPU is that its motherboard can use, and I will be purchasing it. Yes, it is two generations old -- which means it will not cost a lot of money -- and upgrading its CPU will very likely add 2 or more years to its potential life-span.

Its purpose will be for doing homework, playing games, and surfing the web -- all of which it can do as-is, so the upgrading will be purely to maximize its potential and make it as useful as it can be for one of my kids. That is pretty cool when you consider that it is so old that it is supposed to be useless by now, right?

Join the Upgraders

When you view a PC from a modular approach you expand its capability simply by changing that POV. Rather than save a long time to purchase a new system, you can budget your upgrades and, over the course of a year, end up with a new system that stays near the cutting edge without having to fork over money for the bits you do not need to replace.

Modular upgrading is more than just how you own a computer, it is a computing lifestyle choice. It also allows you to do things with your PC you cannot do with an out-of-the-box name brand system.

The upgrade series I am in the process of writing will cover all of that --- and if you are interested in changing your POV on computers, you should read it! The most significant change starts with the foundation of the PC, which in simple terms is its Case and Power Supply. With so wide a selection covering a variety of concentrations, selecting a case to use as the foundation for a new modular PC is not a decision that should be made lightly, either.

The case you choose should be the last case you will ever need to purchase, and it is the one part of your PC where cost should not be a consideration at all! Selecting the right case -- the right foundation -- is key to the whole process, and that is going to be the next piece in the series. I hope you will read it -- I hope to convert you to my way of looking at this subject -- and I welcome questions or thoughts on it.

This blog is going to be featured more prominently on my website soon, and I hope to use it as the main comment and reply venue -- so consider this an open invitation to you to ask questions or offer your own opinions, starting with this question: What do you think is the most important function of a PC case?

Cheers!

Chris